Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRfwJWGjEOtAt2WVsrTWo1gaTF92P+JTvu6vc8qwjDavCw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The documentation available at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-createtable.html, does not make it clear that the lower bound of a range partition is always inclusive and the higher one is exclusive. I think a note in section " PARTITION OF parent_table FOR VALUES partition_bound_spec" would be helpful. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2017/01/25 5:55, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Amit Langote >> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> [ new patches ] >> >> Committed 0001 and 0002. See my earlier email for comments on 0003. > > It seems patches for all the issues mentioned in this thread so far, > except 0003 (I just sent an updated version in another email), have been > committed. Thanks a lot for your time. I will create new threads for any > more patches from here on. > > Regards, > Amit > > -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: