Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ashutosh Bapat
Тема Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL
Дата
Msg-id CAFjFpRfrQ8Hdr0fYnPRVHHgOTQEFt2DbR2weHuU0MTs2oz_ntg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: parallel append vs. simple UNION ALL  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> It looks like it was not changed in all the places. make falied. I
>> have fixed all the instances of these two functions in the attached
>> patchset (only 0003 changes). Please check.
>
> Oops.  Thanks.
>
> I'm going to go ahead and commit 0001 here.  Any more thoughts on the rest?

Nope. I am good with the patchset.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions