Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect documentation about pg_stat_activity
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect documentation about pg_stat_activity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRfqMkCHwqiL4WQz1ujR5EkrVwkDFLHRX=x3ZWwPooVVQw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect documentation about pg_stat_activity (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect documentation about pg_stat_activity
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 21 June 2017 at 16:15, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017 19:08:35 +0530 >> Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: >>> > >>> > Attached is a patch for the documentation fix. >>> > >>> Please attach the patch as well. :-) >> >> I'm sorry, I forgot it. I attahed this. > > Thanks, will apply. The patch is adjusting documentation for the observed behaviour. But I don't see a justification as to why the observed behaviour is correct one? Was there a commit which allowed startup process to be part of pg_stat_activity but forgot to update the documentation or the current behaviour is unintentional and probably needs to be fixed? -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: