Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Rafia Sabih
> <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
>> <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's set of patches rebased on latest head.
>>
>>
>> In an attempt to test this set of patches, I found that not all of the
>> patches could be applied on latest head-- commit
>> 08aed6604de2e6a9f4d499818d7c641cbf5eb9f7
>> Might be in need of rebasing.
>
> Thanks Rafia for your interest. I have started rebasing the patches on
> the latest head. I am expecting it to take some time. Will update the
> thread with the patches once I am done rebasing them.
>

Here are patches rebased.

As mentioned in my previous mail [1], the last two patches are not
complete but are included, so that the reviewer can see the changes we
will have to make when we go towards more general partition-wise join.
Please use patches upto 0015, which implement 1:1 partition mapping
for benchmarking and testing.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRdF8GpmSjjn0fm85cMW2iz+r3MQJQ_HC0eDATzWSv5buw@mail.gmail.com

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers