Re: [HACKERS] foreign partition DDL regression tests
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] foreign partition DDL regression tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRfbZccT3d11r-_jxEAqbo9R5vY0mF3Po8XUVS=O2rpMpA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] foreign partition DDL regression tests (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] foreign partition DDL regression tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Amit, Thanks for adding testcases. Overall the testcases look good. The testcase is using ALTER TABLE to modify foreign table schema. Though this works, I think a better option is to use ALTER FOREIGN TABLE. Something not related to this patch but -- no attach partition validation occurs for foreign tables ALTER TABLE pt2 ATTACH PARTITION pt2_1 FOR VALUES IN (1); I am wondering whether we can improve this. For local tables, if a valid constraint equivalent to the partitioning condition is not present on the table being attached, it scans the data to verify partition conditions. But for a foreign table, we don't want to do that since the constraint is not guaranteed to be valid after the initial check. For a normal foreign table a user can set a constraint if s/he knows that that constraint will be honoured on the foreign server. Thus instead of saying that we do not validate data, we can refuse to attach a partition if corresponding check constraint is absent on the foreign table being attached. A user will then be forced to add that constraint if s/he is sure that the constraint will be obeyed on the foreign server. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: