Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRfScLMD6RkC=mkw3z-LNfa+K+=vY7JgXNXSgD9RBTMKcg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: TupleTableSlot abstraction
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2018-08-17 01:07:06 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2018-08-17 12:10:20 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> > We need to add LLVM code to fetch tts_flags and >> > perform bit operation on it to get or set slow property. I haven't >> > found any precedence for LLVM bit operations in postgresql's JIT code. >> >> There are several, look for the infomask accesses in >> slot_compiler_deform. >> >> I'll try to do the adaption later today. > > Attached is a series of patches doing so. The previous implementation > of sysvar accesses wasn't actually working - the slot argument was > uninitialized. Sorry for that. I couldn't test it since the code wasn't compiling. The changes to slot_compile_deform changes you provided in the patch fix the compilation errors. Thanks for those changes. > > I also noticed an independent issue in your changes to > ExecInitScanTupleSlot(): You can't assume that the plan belonging to the > ScanState have a Scan node in their plan. Look e.g. at Material, Sort > etc. So currently your scanrelid access is often just uninitialized > data. I have incorporated changes in your patches into the relevant patches in the updated patch-set. With this patch-set make check-world passes for me. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: