Re: Postgres 10 problem with UNION ALL of null value in "subselect"
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres 10 problem with UNION ALL of null value in "subselect" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRf6Q0B9m2qqsQjw9vTyh8r2S=FG2SUb360Mg3CbxQ1ciA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgres 10 problem with UNION ALL of null value in "subselect" (Martin Swiech <martin.swiech@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres 10 problem with UNION ALL of null value in "subselect"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Martin Swiech <martin.swiech@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I got some complex query which works on PostgreSQL 9.6 , but fails on > PostgreSQL 10. > > Version of PostgreSQL: > PostgreSQL 10.3 on x86_64-apple-darwin14.5.0, compiled by Apple LLVM version > 7.0.0 (clang-700.1.76), 64-bit > > Simplified core of the problematic query looks like this: > ``` > select * from ( > select 1::integer as a > ) t1 > union all > select * from ( > select null as a > ) t2; > ``` > > It fails with this error message: > ``` > ERROR: UNION types integer and text cannot be matched > LINE 5: select * from ( > ^ > SQL state: 42804 > Character: 66 > ``` > The error disappears if we go one commit before 1e7c4bb0049732ece651d993d03bb6772e5d281a, the error disappears. But that's I think expected with that commit. We can work around this problem by casting null to integer like null::integer. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: