Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRevm9kqKzvUCmF5w4TSSCgXG5uD5i4n9cdTjdSBsAxnTg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi > <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Ashutosh Bapat >> Changed partition-wise statement to partitionwise. >> Attached re-based patch. >> >>> The patch looks good to me. I don't think we can reduce it further. >>> But we need some tests to test PWJ with default partitions. Marking >>> this as ready for committer. > > Hi Rajkumar, > > partition_join ... FAILED > That made my heart stop for fraction of a second. I thought, something happened which caused partition_join test fail in master. But then I realised you are talking about Rajkumar's patch and test in that patch. I think it's better to start a separate thread discussing his patch, before I loose my heart ;) -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: