Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRecjHCLjrSi0Pr=suLvXaAxEnvXCrcmV1-r7jW7q5778g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables (Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Partition information: > Type of partitioning - single column range partition > Tables partitioned - Lineitem and orders > > Lineitem - > Partition key = l_orderkey > No of partitions = 18 > > Orders - > Partition key = o_orderkey > No of partitions = 11 > The patch set upto 0015 would refuse to join two partitioned relations using a partition-wise join if they have different number of partitions. Next patches implement a more advanced partition matching algorithm only for list partitions. Those next patches would refuse to apply partition-wise join for range partitioned tables. So, I am confused as to how come partition-wise join is being chosen even when the number of partitions differ. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: