Re: dropping table in testcase alter_table.sql
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dropping table in testcase alter_table.sql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRecGZhMgpHy8Z_7_T5kYQ-fVhHSaex3-nUztLV4mELOnA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dropping table in testcase alter_table.sql (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: dropping table in testcase alter_table.sql
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
I think, tab1 and tab2 are too common names, for anyone to pick up for the tables. Also, the test alter_table.sql is dropping many other tables (even those which have undergone renaming), then why not these two?
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Ashutosh BapatThe regression tests leave lots of objects lying around in the
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the test alter_table.sql is creating two tables tab1 and tab2
> and it's not dropping it. Any test which follows this test and tries to
> create tables with names tab1 and tab2 will fail (unless it drops those
> tables first, but that may not work, since tab2.y depends upon tab1 in
> alter_table.sql).
>
> PFA patch which drops these two tables from alter_table.sql and
> corresponding OUT change. The regression run clean with this patch.
regression database... why drop these two, as opposed to any of the
others?
I think, tab1 and tab2 are too common names, for anyone to pick up for the tables. Also, the test alter_table.sql is dropping many other tables (even those which have undergone renaming), then why not these two?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EntepriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: