Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpReY_0zcs=diKLN5=yWw0Onb0wG0wS21o35zmfr0L45QSg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2017/02/21 12:10, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> I think, that's a limitation till we implement global indexes. But >> nothing in the current implementation stops us from implementing it. >> In fact, I remember, a reply from Robert to another thread on >> partitioning started in parallel to Amit's thread had explained some >> of these design decisions. I am unable to find link to that exact >> reply though. > > Are you perhaps thinking of the message titled "design for a partitioning > feature (was: inheritance)" a few months back: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZeV0nryvw9cNB81xdOJg4XtpJMKDif0zTo-GdLcOCgcQ@mail.gmail.com Thanks a lot, that's the one I was searching for. And now that I confirm it, there's NO reply to Robert's mail. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: