Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpReLrHoPH1G6AwPsnMXkpyFve_iFyD+BDt-o0yKymfF+Bw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] dropping partitioned tables without CASCADE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > if (tuples > 0) > { > - if (tableinfo.relkind != RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE) > - printfPQExpBuffer(&buf, _("Number of child tables: %d (Use \\d+ to list them.)"),tuples); > - else > - printfPQExpBuffer(&buf, _("Number of partitions: %d (Use \\d+ to list them.)"),tuples); > + printfPQExpBuffer(&buf, _("Number of %s: %d (Use \\d+ to list them.)"), ct, tuples); > printTableAddFooter(&cont, buf.data); > } > > Please don't do this, because it breaks translatability. I think the > original is fine. > We have used this style in the "else" case of if (!verbose). So, I just copied it. I have removed that change in the attached patch. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: