Re: Thinko/typo in ExecSimpleRelationInsert
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Thinko/typo in ExecSimpleRelationInsert |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpReBLapc27-bkHr_-+uZ2D+mb6Fp8NL5ENcTsHpDuuNd3A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Thinko/typo in ExecSimpleRelationInsert (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Thinko/typo in ExecSimpleRelationInsert
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Ashutosh Bapat > <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Ashutosh Bapat >>> <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>>> Looks like we need similar adjustment in ExecSimpleRelationUpdate() as >>>> well. Updated the patch. >>>> >>> >>> - /* Store the slot into tuple that we can write. */ >>> + /* Materialize slot into a tuple that we can inspect. */ >>> tuple = ExecMaterializeSlot(slot); >>> >>> I think it is better to keep the last word of the sentence as "write" >>> instead of "inspect" as was in the original sentence. >> >> A copy-pasto while correcting a typo :) >> >>> It makes more >>> sense as we are materializing the tuple to write it. Similarly, in >>> the other change in the patch can use "write". >> >> Are you suggesting that we should use "write" in the modified comment >> instead of "inspect" in original comment. >> > > Yes. > > Another variant used in few other similar places is: > > /* > * get the heap tuple out of the tuple table slot, making sure we have a > * writable copy > */ > > >> Ok, I have now corrected grammar as well. Here's updated patch. >> > > Your new comment is also correct. I like the comment already used in > code as that makes the code consistent, what do you think? > I don't understand what do you mean by consistent. Do you mean to say that current usage " Store the slot into tuple ... " is correct? I don't think " so that we can write" is right usage either. I think, there should be a preposition after "write" something like "write to", to indicate that we will write to tuple. I find "scrible upon" to be better than "write to". But I am not wedded to any of those. However, I do want to change "store the slot into tuple" usage, which is wrong as explained earlier as well as in the commit message. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: