Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRe37L3VSzW=+Q2Ehb2Zk4xhmFAg9sSGBQ2r5JB=CdvnXA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery (Douglas Doole <dougdoole@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Push limit to sort through a subquery
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The function pass_down_bound() is a recursive function. For SubqueryScanState we have to do something similar to ResultState i.e. call pass_down_bound() recursively on subqueryScanState->subplan. Please add this to the next commitfest. On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Douglas Doole <dougdoole@gmail.com> wrote: > We've hit a case where pass_down_bound() isn't pushing the row count limit > from limit into sort. The issue is that we're getting a subquery scan node > between the limit and the sort. The subquery is only doing column projection > and has no quals or SRFs so it should be safe to push the limit into the > sort. > > The query that hit the problem can be simplified to: > > SELECT * FROM (SELECT A,B FROM T ORDER BY C) LIMIT 5 > > (Yeah, the query's a little screwy in that the ORDER BY should really be > outside the subselect, but it came from a query generator, so that's a > different conversation.) > > Proposed patch is attached. > > - Doug > Salesforce > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: