Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRdfa9aCqV5Bv-1Biuurzexw00yQJ7v_Wn4VDLdMnrNv8w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Rafia had done some testing on TPCH queries using Partition-wise join > patch along with Parallel Append patch. > > There, we had observed that for query 4, even though the partition > wise joins are under a Parallel Append, the join are all non-partial. > > Specifically, the partition-wise join has non-partial nested loop > joins when actually it was expected to have partial nested loop joins. > (The difference can be seen by the observation that the outer relation > of that join is scanned by non-parallel Bitmap Heap scan when it > should have used Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan). > > Here is the detailed analysis , including where I think is the issue : > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJ3gD9cZms1ND3p%3DNN%3DhDYDFt_SeKq1htMBhbj85bOmvJwY5fg%40mail.gmail.com > > All the TPCH results are posted in the same above mail thread. Can you please check if the attached patch fixes the issue. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: