Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRdMcV4ZDiZFesYNs7aX1GsPjGyBHqCGMEJqSkknFX=jdw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 3:32 PM, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote: >> + hash_part? true : key->parttypbyval[j], >> + key->parttyplen[j]); >> parttyplen is the length of partition key attribute, whereas what you want here >> is the length of type of modulus and remainder. Is that correct? Probably we >> need some special handling wherever parttyplen and parttypbyval is used e.g. in >> call to partition_bounds_equal() from build_joinrel_partition_info(). >> > > Unless I am missing something, I don't think we should worry about parttyplen > because in the datumCopy() when the datatype is pass-by-value then typelen > is ignored. That's true, but it's ugly, passing typbyvalue of one type and len of other. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: