Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRd9qvfdu4H8J8tnTD6Hhcg0V2Ct2cumHMk-M6Ex_fEa5Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 5/15/17 23:45, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> +1. We should throw an error and add a line in documentation that >> collation should not be specified for hash partitioned table. > > Why is it even allowed in the parser then? That grammar is common to all the partitioning strategies. It looks like it's easy to handle collation for hash partitions in transformation than in grammar. But, if we could handle it in grammar, I don't have any objection to it. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: