Re: UNION ALL - Var attno
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: UNION ALL - Var attno |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRd3L2foEXJeahPuJzfkz24CUfV5Vw-37g84K2ptBr4e_w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: UNION ALL - Var attno (sri harsha <sriharsha9992@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:12 AM, sri harsha <sriharsha9992@gmail.com> wrote:
Its not an OpExpr . It is a VAR , got it from "reltargetlist" in base relation ( RelOptInfo) . Can you shed some light on where the conversion from 141 to "original" attribute number takes place ??
If you try to print the node as *(Node *) node in a debugger, it will tell you the type of node. What does that print?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:sri harsha <sriharsha9992@gmail.com> writes:
> Assume the following query ,
> (SELECT a * 1 , b FROM TABLE_1) UNION ALL (SELECT a *1 , b FROM TABLE_2);
> In this query , attribute number of the VARs are 141 and 2 respectively !!
I doubt it.
Maybe you're looking at something that's not a Var, possibly an OpExpr,
but assuming it's a Var? The fact that 141 is the pg_proc OID of int4mul
lends considerable weight to this suspicion ...
regards, tom lane
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: