Re: Additional Statistics Hooks
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Additional Statistics Hooks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRcwcAtMvFXpdL6chMS7Q-+-n8xiznSeenm4C_xug8zyFg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Additional Statistics Hooks (Mat Arye <mat@timescale.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Additional Statistics Hooks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:55 PM, Mat Arye <mat@timescale.com> wrote: >> >> Like cost associated with a function, we may associate mapping >> cardinality with a function. It tells how many distinct input values >> map to 1 output value. By input value, I mean input argument tuple. In >> Mat's case the mapping cardinality will be 12. The number of distinct >> values that function may output is estimated as number of estimated >> rows / mapping cardinality of that function. > > > I think this is complicated by the fact that the mapping cardinality is not > a constant per function > but depends on the constant given as the first argument to the function and > the granularity of the > underlying data (do you have a second-granularity or microsecond > granularity). I actually think the logic for the > estimate here should be the (max(time)-min(time))/interval. I think to be > general you need to allow functions on statistics to determine the estimate. > I think my solution was quite short-sighted. You are right. We need a function taking statistics about the input argument as input and output the statistics about the output. The planner can then use this statistics to arrive at various estimates. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: