Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRcgfErt6ZuDAt2GzTHgJjPaXFiRXrBzdVzDF888+qZ_UA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Ashutosh Bapat >> I have changed some comments around this block. See attached patch. >> Let me know if that looks good. > > Thanks, it looks good. > Thanks. The patch 02_close_listen... closes the listen sockets explicitly when it's known that postmaster is going to stop all the children and then die. I have tried to see, if there's a possibility that it closes the listen sockets but do not actually die, thus causing a server which doesn't accept any connections and doesn't die. But I have not found that possibility. I do not have any further comments about both the patches. None else has volunteered to review the patch till now. So, marking the entry as ready for committer.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: