Re: [HACKERS] no test coverage for ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER nameHANDLER ...

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2017/05/09 22:52, Mark Dilger wrote:
>>
>>> On May 9, 2017, at 12:18 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 2017/05/05 9:38, Mark Dilger wrote:
>>>> Hackers,
>>>>
>>>> just FYI, I cannot find any regression test coverage of this part of the grammar, not
>>>> even in the contrib/ directory or TAP tests.  I was going to submit a patch to help out,
>>>> and discovered it is not so easy to do, and perhaps that is why the coverage is missing.
>>>
>>> I think we could add the coverage by defining a dummy C FDW handler
>>> function in regress.c.  I see that some other regression tests use C
>>> functions defined there, such as test_atomic_ops().
>>>
>>> What do you think about the attached patch?  I am assuming you only meant
>>> to add tests for the code in foreigncmds.c (CREATE/ALTER FOREIGN DATA
>>> WRAPPER).
>>
>> Thank you for creating the patch.  I only see one small oversight, which is the
>> successful case of ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER ... HANDLER ... is still
>> not tested.  I added one line for that in the attached modification of your patch.
>
> Ah right, thanks.
>
> Adding this to the next commitfest as Ashutosh suggested.
>

The patch needs a rebase.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company