Re: [HACKERS] Parallel COPY FROM execution
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel COPY FROM execution |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRDxYPirwZyBSPbnC5GGVcgv3WLkjO2QMxV=uHuarcbg9w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel COPY FROM execution (Alex K <kondratov.aleksey@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel COPY FROM execution
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2017-06-30 15:42 GMT+02:00 Alex K <kondratov.aleksey@gmail.com>:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2017-06-30 14:23 GMT+02:00 Alex K <kondratov.aleksey@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Thus, it results in a ~60% performance boost per each x2 multiplication of
>> parallel processes, which is consistent with the initial estimation.
>>
>
> the important use case is big table with lot of indexes. Did you test
> similar case?
Not yet, I will try it, thank you for a suggestion. But how much is it
'big table' and 'lot of indexes' in numbers approximately?
the size is about 1/3 RAM size, 60 columns, 30 indexes
Regards
Pavel
Also, index updates and constraint checks performance are what I cannot
control during COPY execution, so probably I have not to care too much
about that. But of course, it is interesting, how does COPY perform in
that case.
Alexey
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: