Re: Add SPI results constants available for PL/*
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add SPI results constants available for PL/* |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRDv4jHcP90-4KXwgYRryNToAtXbCRDZeC3GWnevr=mGqQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add SPI results constants available for PL/* (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add SPI results constants available for PL/*
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2012/1/10 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>: > > > On 01/03/2012 09:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> >> >> On 01/03/2012 08:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Pavel Stehule<pavel.stehule@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'd suppose it interesting to add a table to pg_catalog containing this >>>>> data. >>>> >>>> - it is useless overhead >>> >>> I tend to agree. >>> >>>> I am expecting so definition some constants in Perl, Python is simple >>> >>> Presumably one could instead write a script to transform the list of >>> constants into a .pm file that could be loaded into the background, or >>> whatever PL/python's equivalent of that concept is. Not sure if >>> there's a better way to do it. >> >> >> Yeah, I'm with you and Pavel. Here's my quick perl one-liner to produce a >> set of SPI_* constants for pl/perl. I'm looking at the best way to include >> this in the bootstrap code. >> >> perl -ne 'BEGIN { print "use constant\n{\n"; } END { print "};\n"; } >> print "\t$1 => $2,\n" if /#define (SPI_\S+)\s+\(?(-?\d+)\)?/;' >> src/include/executor/spi.h >> >> >> > > > Actually, now I look closer I see that PLPerl passes back a stringified > status from SPI_execute(), so there is no great need for setting up these > constants. It's probably water under the bridge now, but maybe PLPython > should have done this too. > This is not documented well - I see nothing about result value in doc. Does it raise exception when SPI returns some bad result value? Regards Pavel > cheers > > andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: