Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ?
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRDtopH2ws1L7cXEPmEezsfivkmK_z2EQg8hn8C9TtstFg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2012/5/3 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> You guys seem to be taking the original proposal off into the weeds. I >> have often wanted to be able to use LIKE in type expressions, and I'd >> like to see exactly that implemented. > > This notion of "anytypename" is utterly unworkable anyway; there's no > way for the parser to know soon enough that a given argument position > needs to be read as a type name rather than a normal expression. > You could conceivably make it work with the argument being a regtype > literal (ie, quoted); but that seems at least as klugy as what hstore > is doing. > type identifier is same identifier like other - but I have no prototype now, so I don't know if there is some trap I remember so I though about using CAST keyword too some like SELECT CAST( populate_record(hstore_value) AS type) Regards Pavel > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: