Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRDmFrQ_hLRTXJvYd_StsQNwjMBg_sOORATnCxj+R9vo5A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
Tomorrow I'll do a review
fast check
<para>
+ To aid the user in finding instances of simple but common problems before
+ they cause harm, <application>PL/PgSQL</> provides a number of additional
+ <replaceable>checks</>. When enabled, depending on the configuration, they
+ can be used to emit either a <literal>WARNING</> or an <literal>ERROR</>
+ during the compilation of a function.
+ </para>
>>>provides a number of additional<<<
There will be only one check in 9.4, so this sentence is confusing and should be reformulated.
Regards
Pavel
Pavel
2014-03-18 20:29 GMT+01:00 Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>:
Attached V4 uses "shadowed-variables" instead of "shadow".On 18/03/14 20:15, Pavel Stehule wrote:2014-03-18 20:14 GMT+01:00 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>:On 18 March 2014 19:04, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:"shadowed-variables" would be a better name.
> I don't think so only "shadow" is good name for some check. Maybe
> "shadow-variables-check"
+1-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: