Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRDmCnf8f+ohmNZ5cHZ1=dhDY2c6+snERPvKZM969gvvWg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Closing commitfest 2013-11
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<p dir="ltr">Hello<p dir="ltr">I disagree with it. There was no any request to move "ready for commit" patches to next commitfest!I expected so only unfinishing patches should by moved there by their authors. I sent question to Peter E. Butwithout reply, but Tom did commits from thist list, so I expected so there is some agreement about it and I did'nt anyalarm.<p dir="ltr">My patch there is prerequsity for "dump --if-exi<div class="gmail_quote">Dne 21.1.2014 17:41 "RobertHaas" <<a href="mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com">robertmhaas@gmail.com</a>> napsal(a):<br type="attribution" /><blockquoteclass="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014at 4:31 PM, Tom Lane <<a href="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>> wrote:<br /> > Alvaro Herrera<<a href="mailto:alvherre@2ndquadrant.com">alvherre@2ndquadrant.com</a>> writes:<br /> >> With apologiesto our beloved commitfest-mace-wielding CFM, commitfest<br /> >> 2013-11 intentionally still contains a fewopen patches. I think that<br /> >> CF is largely being ignored by most people now that we have CF 2014-01<br />>> in progress. If we don't want to do anything about these patches in the<br /> >> immediate future, I proposewe move them to CF 2014-01.<br /> ><br /> > I think the idea was that patch authors should take responsibilityfor<br /> > pushing their patches forward to 2014-01 if they still wanted them<br /> > considered. Quitea few patches already were moved that way, IIRC.<br /><br /> Agreed on that general theory.<br /><br /> And, also,yeah, the shared memory message queueing stuff got<br /> committed. Sorry, I missed the fact that there was still anopen CF<br /> entry for that; I assumed that it would have been marked Returned with<br /> Feedback.<br /><br /> --<br/> Robert Haas<br /> EnterpriseDB: <a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com" target="_blank">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br/> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<br /><br /><br /> --<br /> Sent viapgsql-hackers mailing list (<a href="mailto:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org">pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org</a>)<br /> To makechanges to your subscription:<br /><a href="http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers" target="_blank">http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers</a><br/></blockquote></div>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: