Re: Some questions about the array.
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Some questions about the array. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRDSCpmwwzc9KYTGhGLG8PGUJJUu_-Jk_-8nX-BXPFD+sQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Some questions about the array. (YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Some questions about the array.
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2015-11-09 14:44 GMT+01:00 YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>:
On Monday 09 November 2015 13:50:20 Pavel Stehule wrote:
> New symbols increase a complexity of our code and our documentation.
>
> If some functionality can be implemented via functions without performance
> impacts, we should not to create new operators or syntax - mainly for
> corner use cases.
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
Ok we can use {:} instead [:] for zero array access.
The function is the solution half.
It isn't solution. The any syntax/behave change have to have stronger motivation. We had so talk about it 20 years ago :(
Regards
Pavel
--
YUriy Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: