Re: Built-in binning functions
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Built-in binning functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRDDTvSS8WKJMLdYAdkN267DM8qnff2BEX0B9nGeOEtMkQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Built-in binning functions (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Built-in binning functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
I did a review of last patch
1. There is no problem with patchingI did a review of last patch
4. The name with_bucket is probably one with wide agreement
5. There are a basic set of tests for muttable or fixed sized types
Pavel
2014-09-01 21:29 GMT+02:00 Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>:
On 01/09/14 01:42, Tom Lane wrote:I am not sure if we care, probably not.
BTW, was there a reason for not noticing the case of exact match in
the search loop, and falling out early? As it stands the code will
reliably choose the leftmost match if there are multiple equal items
in the search array, but do we care about such cases?
Anyway I attached patch that I am happy with. I am not yet sure what to do with naming.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: