Note about comparation PL/SQL packages and our schema/extensions
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Note about comparation PL/SQL packages and our schema/extensions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRDAdUwJNANY9ZbK3Atp0NXt8hCKqo4=ybc+nutFer+bfA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Note about comparation PL/SQL packages and our schema/extensions
Re: Note about comparation PL/SQL packages and our schema/extensions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
I had talk about possibility to implement PL/SQL packages in Postgres. The package concept is coming from ADA language and it is partially foreign/redundant element in SQL world. Oracle needs it for modularization, because schema plays different role there than in Postgres. My opinion about packages in Postgres is clean - the concept of schemas and extension is simple and just work. I don't see any big gap there. If we don't play Oracle compatibility game, then we don't need to implement class like Oracle package. But there are few features, that can help to PL/pgSQL developers - generally or with porting from Oracle.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: