Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRD641ZLpymw2UneA1UFggaAux4twEdVeVjnj41Yc1sqpQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] merging some features from plpgsql2 project
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>
>> >> *) Some user visible mechanic other than forcing SQL through EXECUTE
>> >> to be able to control plan caching would be useful.
>> >
>> > fully agree.
>> >
>> > Have you some ideas?
>> >
>> > What about plpgsql option (function scope) -- WITHOUT-PLAN-CACHE - any
>> > non
>> > trivial plans will not be cached - and evaluated as parametrized query
>> > only.
>>
>> I have slight preference for syntax marker for each query, similar to
>> INTO. Maybe 'UNCACHED'?
>
>
> I am not clean opinion - the statement level is nice, but what readability?
>
> SELECT UNCACHED t.a, t.b FROM INTO a,b;
Yeah -- this is pretty ugly admittedly. Maybe control directive is
ok, as long as you can set it mid function?ADA uses for this purpose PRAGMA keyword - it is used for everything in ADA - cycle iteration optimization, ...the scope can be statement, block, procedure.so something likeBEGINPRAGMA uncached_plans;SELECT .....END;But it should be verified by some PL/SQL or Ada experts
Little bit better - if PRAGMA is used in DECLARE part, then it has block scope
so some possible design can be:
DECLARE
PRAGMA UNCACHED_PLANS;
BEGIN
SELECT ... INTO ;
SELECT ... INTO ;
END;
This respects Ada and PL/SQL style - probably easy implementation
Regards
Pavel
Regards
merlin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: