Re: dropdb --force
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dropdb --force |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRD5zhyP9qvwE7E9LSE5sNaeBhK_y=7KPJQbd=1CGyE-2Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dropdb --force (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: dropdb --force
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
po 18. 11. 2019 v 7:39 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> napsal:
po 18. 11. 2019 v 7:37 odesílatel Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> napsal:On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:59 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> po 18. 11. 2019 v 6:24 odesílatel Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> napsal:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:33 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > po 18. 11. 2019 v 4:43 odesílatel vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> napsal:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I had seen that isolation test(src/test/isolation) has a framework to
>> >> support this. You can have a look to see if it can be handled using
>> >> that.
>> >
>> >
>> > I'll look there
>> >
>>
>> If we want to have a test for this, then you might want to look at
>> test src/test/recovery/t/013_crash_restart. In that test, we keep a
>> connection open and then validate whether it is terminated. Having
>> said that, I think it might be better to add this as a separate test
>> patch apart from main patch because it is a bit of a timing-dependent
>> test and might fail on some slow machines. We can always revert this
>> if it turns out to be an unstable test.
>
>
> +1
>
So, are you planning to give it a try? I think even if we want to
commit this separately, it is better to have a test for this before we
commit.I'll send this test today
here is it
Regards
Pavel
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: