Re: Hash Indexes
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Hash Indexes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRD5uC4ZWctuAL+3qT=OCjLApaH1e9pNjOw-Cs8UNyjwzg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Hash Indexes (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Hash Indexes
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2016-10-02 12:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>:
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> For one thing, we can stop shipping a totally broken feature in release after release
>
> For what it's worth I'm for any patch that can accomplish that.
>
> In retrospect I think we should have done the hash-over-btree thing
> ten years ago but we didn't and if Amit's patch makes hash indexes
> recoverable today then go for it.
+1.
+1
Pavel
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: