Re: spinlocks storm bug
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: spinlocks storm bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRD1ybs=UOW50CxZ_=ZDZFs2aXSE5r7ZZUSFkgR4k0nYrw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: spinlocks storm bug (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013/12/6 Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
On 2013-12-06 07:22:27 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I have a report of critical bug (database is temporary unavailability ..
> restart is necessary).> PostgreSQL 9.2.4,
> 24 CPU
> 140G RAM
> SSD disc for all
>
>
> Database is under high load. There is a few databases with very high number
> of similar simple statements. When application produce higher load, then
> number of active connection is increased to 300-600 about.
>
> In some moment starts described event - there is a minimal IO, all CPU are
> on 100%.
>
> Perf result shows:
> 354246.00 93.0% s_lock
> /usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/postgres
> 10503.00 2.8% LWLockRelease
> /usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/postgres
> 8802.00 2.3% LWLockAcquire> We try to limit a connection to 300, but I am not sure if this issue is notWe've seen this issue repeatedly now. None of the times it turned out to
> related to some Postgres bug.
be a bug, but just limitations in postgres' scalability. If you can I'd
strongly suggest trying to get postgres binaries compiled with
-fno-omit-frame-pointer installed to check which locks are actually
conteded.
My bet is BufMappingLock.
There's a CF entry about changing our lwlock implementation to scale
better...
one missing info - the customer's staff reduced shared buffers from 30G to 5G without success. A database is 20G about.
Regards
Pavel
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: