Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRCySh0-7zTb548eh=4v0LwL4yy+5SoOYzcQ33m1tvxGVg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for
composite types
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2016-03-16 16:46 GMT+01:00 Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>:
On 03/15/2016 05:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> In short, I think we should reject this implementation and instead try
> to implement the type operators we want in the core grammar's Typename
> production, from which plpgsql will pick it up automatically. That is
> going to require some other syntax than this. As I said, I'm not
> particularly pushing the function-like syntax I wrote upthread; but
> I want to see something that is capable of supporting all those features
> and can be extended later if we think of other type operators we want.
+1
Anyone want to argue against changing the status of this to Rejected or
at least Returned with feedback?
I would to reduce this patch to fix row type issue. There is not any disagreement. I'll send reduced patch today.
Any other functionality is not 9.6 topic.
Regards
Pavel
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: