Re: unrecognized node type: 350
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: unrecognized node type: 350 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRCoo40qUm=t++rAP2fu4fj3J12Q3=8FVMVoRU98GN8MnQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: unrecognized node type: 350 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: unrecognized node type: 350
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
st 16. 11. 2022 v 19:52 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> st 16. 11. 2022 v 19:01 odesílatel shashidhar Reddy <
> shashidharreddy001@gmail.com> napsal:
>>> I could see an error in syslogs, I am not sure what it means.
>>> kernel: [93631.415790] postgres[86383]: segfault at 80 ip
>>> 00007f07f3e3eefd
>>> sp 00007fffcf1db500 error 4 in plpgsql_check.so[7f07f3e2e000+34000]
> The extension plpgsql_check does not contain this message.
Well, no --- it's the kernel reporting a segfault in plpgsql_check.
Although now that you mention it, there should also be traces of this
crash in the Postgres log; it would be interesting to see what's
reported there.
plpgsql_check can be used as a profiler or tracer too. But this functionality is not enabled by default.
So usually at runtime, the plpgsql_check is not active. So it can be nice to get plpgsql_check configuration and stack trace.
> Node with number 350 should be ParamRef
This is v13, so if I wrangled gdb correctly 350 is FuncCall. (One
thing I'm wondering though is if the extension somehow got compiled
against wrong-version headers. But you'd expect that it largely
wouldn't work at all if so.)
I did error in calculation, it is FuncCall
Regards
Pavel
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: