Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRCjLzMZorVHGZNOaFAfWkisJDSThv3c8pX=tWEspH2ESQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2014-09-04 10:53 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>:
On 9/4/14 10:42 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:2014-09-04 10:06 GMT+02:00 Joel Jacobson <joel@trustly.com>:*) but there are probably equally who prefer to handle business logics
outside the databaseIt is maybe main difference between me and you. Usually I don't write CRUD
applications, and I am not sure if plpgsql is good for CRUD.
Mainly I would not to optimize plpgsql primary for CRUD.
I don't think providing syntax to support the CRUD-like use case would be "optimizing it primarily for CRUD". Changing how UPDATE and DELETE work by default would be, but that's not being suggested here (anymore).
I am strong in opinion so safe stored procedures should be verbose. It is in contradiction to Joel direction.
I wrote a proposal, how to do more friendly but still enough verbose
Pavel
.marko
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: