Re: \timing interval
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: \timing interval |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRChHS0hnCw-Yq1+oL93Eq+JgEn4CLM0SBQ58wruEriOpQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: \timing interval (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2016-09-08 13:10 GMT+02:00 Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>:
On 4 Sep. 2016 3:36 am, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> After further thought I concluded that not providing any labeling of
> days is a bad idea.Yeah. I think labeling days is definitely good. I'm glad you changed that.
Personally I'd like to trim milliseconds when dealing with minute+ long runs and seconds from hour+ runs too, since it's all there in the ms output and the units output is for human readability. I see the value of retaining full precision too, though, and don't feel strongly about it.
It should be hard to read without units. I know so now it is maybe late, but the current output is not too readable for me. I miss units - 10s, 1m20.5s, 1h 30m 5s
Regards
Pavel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: