Re: Getting to 9.3 beta
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Getting to 9.3 beta |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRCek7rd2AbNT=aTd1cBppZ6Uc_8UNxP7KXk+8MV92opsg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Getting to 9.3 beta (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
- plpgsql_check_function:
Tom says (27661.1364267665@sss.pgh.pa.us) that even if the approach
can be aggreed uppon it needs quite a bit more work
=> move
Can we talk about this patch little bit more before moving to next commitfest?
I would to have some plan to next commitfest. We have to remove some wanted functionality - possibility to identify more issues in one run, remove warnings, ... or we have significantly refactor plpgsql parser (two stages)
Next possibility - introduce some new API and move plpgsql_check_function to external module, although I am thinking so this is important and very missing functionality (and should be in core) still.
There is no reply, comments to my last update - where I rewrote output, what was mayor Tom's objection (well specified).
Regards
Pavel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: