Re: patch: CHECK FUNCTION statement
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: patch: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRCcWE_ArCW-eU7nrae9fEW8jUA=YB=Y3xP3hzOotODZwA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: patch: CHECK FUNCTION statement (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: patch: CHECK FUNCTION statement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello 2011/11/14 Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>: > On 6 October 2011 12:52, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> I am sending a version with regress tests and basic documentation > > Hi Pavel, > > I think this sentence needs rewriting: > > "checkfunction is the name of a previously registered function that > will be called when a new function in the language is created, to > check the function by statemnt CHECK FUNCTION or CHECK TRIGGER." > > to something like: > > "checkfunction is the name of an existing function that will be called > whenever a CHECK FUNCTION or CHECK TRIGGER is requested on a function > written in the language." > > And shouldn't this apply to ALTER LANGUAGE too? > > And there seem to be copy/paste symptoms in > doc/src/sgml/ref/check_function.sgml where it shows the definition of > CREATE FUNCTION and CREATE TRIGGER instead of CHECK FUNCTION and CHECK > TRIGGER. > > In src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h there's the error message "there are > no plan for query:". This should probably read "there is no plan for > query:". This appears more than once. > > And "cannot to identify real type for record type variable" doesn't > sound right. Firstly "to" shouldn't be in there, and referring to a > "real" type is ambiguous as there is a data type called "real". This > appears at least twice. I am not native speaker, so please, fix documentation as you like. > > In src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c: > > "cannot to determine a result of dynamic SQL" should be "cannot > determine result of dynamic SQL". > > Also, I recommend rebasing this patch as it doesn't apply cleanly. In > particular, the following fail: > > src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_funcs.c > src/test/regress/expected/plpgsql.out > src/test/regress/sql/plpgsql.sql > > I haven't tried actually testing the patch itsel, but I will probably > give it a go if a rebased version appears. :) There will be more work, I found one area, that was not checked - expr targets. this new code is on github https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_lint this week I plan to redesign this contrib module to CHECK FUNCTION implementation for 9.2. Regards Pavel > > -- > Thom Brown > Twitter: @darkixion > IRC (freenode): dark_ixion > Registered Linux user: #516935 > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: