Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRCZAxgg0xBb7T9uw3C-geLai=ogKCQL2mUaaAwjFz77Hw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
út 25. 1. 2022 v 9:48 odesílatel Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> napsal:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:35:09AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> út 25. 1. 2022 v 6:18 odesílatel Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> napsal:
>
> > I think the lock should be
> > acquired during IdentifyVariable. It should probably be optional as one
> > codepath only needs the information to raise a warning when a variable is
> > shadowed, so a concurrent drop isn't a problem there.
> >
>
> There is a problem, because before the IdentifyVariable call I don't know
> if the variable will be shadowed or not.
>
> If I lock a variable inside IdentifyVariable, then I need to remember if I
> did lock there, or if the variable was locked already, and If the variable
> is shadowed and if lock is fresh, then I can unlock the variable.
But in transformColumnRef() you already know if you found a matching column or
not when calling IdentifyVariable(), so you know if an existing variable will
shadow it right?
yes, you have true,
Thank you
Couldn't you call something like
lockit = node == NULL;
varid = IdentifyVariable(cref->fields, &attrname, ¬_unique, lockit);
The only other caller is transformLetStmt(), which should always lock the
variable anyway.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: