Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRCX_7UJ6Rfg+FD3X49YWJL9-KSEebK9CfSOCQ9RU1kCmA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or genericplan  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or genericplan  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения


2018-03-01 23:10 GMT+01:00 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>:
On 2018-01-23 17:08:56 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2018-01-22 23:15 GMT+01:00 Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>:
> > This really could use a new thread, imv.  This thread is a year old and
> > about a completely different feature than what you've implemented here.
> >
>
> true, but now it is too late

At the very least the CF entry could be renamed moved out the procedual
language category?

Why not? Have you idea, what category is best?

Regards

Pavel

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Следующее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative