Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRCQBhf8R-Ju2WLpyAwaix8nW6BYmcFfpGYkJ3rDpphfuw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013/11/19 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:I think that's true, but not particularly relevant. CTEs are
>> Now that having been said, I'm a bit wary of adding every new frammish
>> someone suggests to PL/pgsql. Many of the things we've added recently
>> are things I anticipate that I'll never use.
>
> lot of features are popular with some delay. CTE is very popular now, and
> two years ago only few developers used it. Lot of applications are developed
> for 9.1 still.
obviously a major feature; a lot of the stuff we've been adding to
PL/pgsql is tinkering around the edges.
I agree so almost all last features are not major features - but I don't think so it is wrong (and structured exception is not minor feature). Almost all work is done.
There are only few issues, that should be solved:
* deeper checking embedded SQL
* more robust work with nested types - assign statement
* some support for large and complex projects (support for developer tools like coverage calculation, dependency graphs and assertions)
Regards
Pavel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: