Re: [HACKERS] proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRCGePzccGX-aVywhZYBuHfUVay4FiaNof2qWEuraPocCg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2017-01-28 17:58 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> 2017-01-28 17:09 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> Seems like that would make a difference in only a tiny minority of
>> situations. In a deeply nested plan you'll have trouble no matter
>> what, and it's not uncommon that the node name line isn't the widest
>> thing anyway.
> It is related to presentation where you have to use large type - and where
> usually don't present complex nested plans, or you present only fragments.
Sure, but then you're whacking around the text anyway while you put it
into your slides. I doubt anyone would have trouble understanding your
slides if you break up the lines like that, whether or not it's exactly
what you'd get out of EXPLAIN itself.
I cannot to break lines when I use psql and mirrored screen.
Regards
Pavel
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: