Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRCEBbB3iUqqXsj4wawjHteB2oMHRf1R4wucUzstm=fpkA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file (Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
po 7. 9. 2020 v 14:14 odesílatel Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000@gmail.com> napsal:
Hi PavelOn Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:22 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:Here is updated patch for pg_dump
pg_dumpall also has –exclude-database=pattern and –no-comments option doesn't that qualify it to benefits from this feature? And please add a test case for this option
This patch is related to pg_dump (in this moment), so pg_dumpall options are out of scope.
I am not sure if pg_dumpall needs this functionality - maybe, but I can use bash or some similar for implementation of this feature. There is no requirement to do it all necessary work under one transaction, one snapshot.
For pg_dump can be used different format, because it uses different granularity. Some like "{+/-} dbname"
"--no-comments" is a global parameter without arguments. I don't understand how this parameter can be related to this feature?
I am working on regress tests.
Regards
Pavel
regards
Surafel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: