Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRCBGCA8jc7AigF7W4=4Sm2MR28PFXPtmOTCZeDmhRedvA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013/8/20 David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com>
On Aug 20, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:What if I call another function I wrote myself that returns an INT, but I do not care about the INT? Maybe that function does the insert and returns the number of inserted rows.
> pg_notify returns void, so there are no necessary casting to void
>
> so enhanced check - so all returned columns are void should be enough
I can think of all kinds of reasons this might be the case; whether they are good or bad approaches is immaterial: sometimes you work with what you have.
I am find with PERFORM to determine when a query's results should be discarded. I just think it needs to cover a few more cases.
yes
I understand. I'll look, how PERFORM can be fixed
Regards
Pavel
Pavel
Best,
David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: