Re: proposal: lob conversion functionality
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: lob conversion functionality |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRC9g8qKLCLGNEuJFw5pmQLJoLTM64FSCXvsbf+OtU09LA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: lob conversion functionality (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: lob conversion functionality
Re: proposal: lob conversion functionality Re: proposal: lob conversion functionality |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013/8/10 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: >> I found so there are no simple API for working with LO from PL without >> access to file system. > > What? See lo_open(), loread(), lowrite(), etc. > yes, so there are three problems with these functions: a) probably (I didn't find) undocumented b) design with lo handler is little bit PL/pgSQL unfriendly. CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION parser.save_as_lob(bytea) RETURNS oid AS $$ DECLARE loid oid; fd integer; bytes integer; BEGIN loid := lo_creat(-1); fd := lo_open(loid, 131072); bytes := lowrite(fd, $1); IF (bytes != LENGTH($1)) THEN RAISEEXCEPTION 'Not all data copied to blob'; END IF; PERFORM lo_close(fd); RETURN loid; END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql SECURITY DEFINER STRICT SET search_path = 'pg_catalog'; CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fbuilder.attachment_to_bytea(attachment oid) RETURNS bytea AS $$ DECLAREfd integer;size integer; BEGINfd := lo_open(attachment, 262144);size := lo_lseek(fd, 0, 2);PERFORM lo_lseek(fd, 0, 0);RETURN loread(fd, size); EXCEPTION WHEN undefined_object THEN PERFORM lo_close(fd); RETURN NULL; END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql STRICT SECURITY DEFINER SET search_path = 'pg_catalog'; I had to use lot of magic constants, and getting size is not size too. I believe so almost all reading will be a complete read, and then it should be supported (maybe loread(fd, -1)). c) probably there is a bug - it doesn't expect handling errors postgres=# select fbuilder.attachment_to_xml(0); WARNING: Snapshot reference leak: Snapshot 0x978f6f0 still referencedattachment_to_xml ───────────────────[null] (1 row) Time: 0.809 ms >> These functions can be simplified if we supports some functions like >> encode, decode for LO > > I do not see any good reason to tie encode/decode to LOs. It can save a one transformations - but it is not too important and can be easy done with current bytea API. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: