Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent LWLock refactoring.
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent LWLock refactoring. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRC3qMv1s6yWem4GDezLSJNV0vo3n7APLXu4r-FeXqn2ag@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent LWLock refactoring. (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent
LWLock refactoring.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2016-04-12 15:15 GMT+02:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>:
2016-04-12 14:51 GMT+02:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> If there will be simple way, how to fix it, then I'll fix my extensions. But
> new API is working only when the extension has own share memory segment. For
> some complex extensions like Orafce it means expensive refactoring.
>
> What is worst, this refactoring is difficult now, because I support older
> versions when I have not private shared segments.
You don't need a separate shared memory segment. You might want to
have a look at what we did for pldebugger:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pldebugger.git;a=commitdiff;h=14c6caf08bb14a7404a8241e47a80ef5f97e451e
I think the problem is similar to the one you are facing with orafce.I'll try it. Thank you for info
It is working. Thank you
Pavel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: