Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent LWLock refactoring.
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent LWLock refactoring. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRC-yhoqMz=tv3f478X_Eq_BU-hL+9wGaB26LsFThwF7=w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent LWLock refactoring. (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent
LWLock refactoring.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2016-02-12 15:46 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>:
2016-02-12 15:43 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That's very strange. It looks to me like you did exactly the right
>> thing. Can you provide any details on how it fails?
>
> Looks like some race conditions is there - but I didn't tested it deeper
Well, OK, so I'm totally willing to work with you to help get this
straightened out, but I'm not really going to go download orafce and
debug it for you on company time. I'm fairly sure that won't win me
any large awards.I'll do it - just need to finish some other. I hope so this night I'll know more.
In _PG_init I am creating new tranche by RequestNamedLWLockTranche("orafce", 1);
Immediately when I try to use this lock
shmem_lock = sh_mem->shmem_lock = &(GetNamedLWLockTranche("orafce"))->lock;
shmem_lock = sh_mem->shmem_lock = &(GetNamedLWLockTranche("orafce"))->lock;
I got a error
ERROR: XX000: requested tranche is not registered
LOCATION: GetNamedLWLockTranche, lwlock.c:602
ERROR: XX000: requested tranche is not registered
LOCATION: GetNamedLWLockTranche, lwlock.c:602
Because the session initialization doesn't finish, then Orafce doesn't work
RegardsPavel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: