Re: Some questions about the array.
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Some questions about the array. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRC-PucpbhBR7v45u88uAB42mfhfczvkyRU+bOtSxiD7Qw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Some questions about the array. (YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Some questions about the array.
Re: Some questions about the array. |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2015-11-09 13:32 GMT+01:00 YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>:
On Monday 09 November 2015 13:29:30 you wrote:
> It is ugly, but you can wrap it to function - so still I don't see any
> reason, why it is necessary
For example, I'm writing a lot of queries by hands...
This functionality is available in many languages and it's just convenient. Of
course it is possible and without it, but why?
New symbols increase a complexity of our code and our documentation.
If some functionality can be implemented via functions without performance impacts, we should not to create new operators or syntax - mainly for corner use cases.
Regards
Pavel
Thanks.
--
YUriy Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: