Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRBu+NeKRaM9M4kLkfx4yRDX0UmUdW0dL0pseV8vP_6xgA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
pá 4. 1. 2019 v 14:07 odesílatel Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> napsal:
On 06/12/2018 18:27, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> For my purpose I can imagine PRAGMA on function level with same syntax
> like PL/SQL - I need to push somewhere some information that I can use
> for plpgsql_check to protect users against false alarms. The locality in
> this moment is not too important for me. But I prefer solution that
> doesn't looks too strange, and is possible just with change plpgsql parser.
When you are about to warn about a particular statement, you have the
statement's line number, so you can look up the source code and check
for any disable-this-warning comments.
It means to write own lexer and preparse source code before I start checking.
I think so block level PRAGMA is significantly better solution
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: